This is a post to answer a student’s question of what is
purpose.
Thank you for how well thought out your arguments are. You quoted something I said and then asked “Why
must there be a purpose? Who finds it necessary to have this purpose, is
it man, the universe, or a supreme being?”
These are
some great questions. Let me start by
asking some of my own, just to make a point.
What is the purpose of breathing, a heart pumping, drinking clean water,
studying, learning, believing etc…? What is the purpose of studying the laws of
physics, science, etc…? What is the
purpose of calling anything good or evil, right or wrong?
If we
suggest that the universe created us it is very logical to conclude the
universe has purpose. Why else did the
universe create us? Why does a
programmer, program, or an athlete play sports, or a drug addict take the next
hit? In every action there is
purpose. To say the universe had no
great purpose does not mean there is no purpose. Every action has purpose. So even if we are an accident- a byproduct of
some greater purpose, this does not negate purpose all together. Even in your own argument you suggest other
purposes than man being the purpose.
So, in
this hypothetical scenario, the universe creates for whatever purpose, humanity
comes on the seen either by pure accident or by specific design. Either way the universe must take notice
because it had its purpose in creating something. The universe is either totally aware of what
mankind will do, therefore leading to purpose beyond man’s opinions. Or the universe is caught by surprise and
therefore learns something about its creative capabilities. This too has purpose.
But your
next argument will be something like this:
Who says that the universe created with purpose? How do we know that the universe had to have
purpose? What if the universe is an
accident?
All these
questions leads to something bigger than the universe having purpose and either
knew what they were doing or by accident created a universe that allowed for
life. This something is either the
multiverse god or a more traditional God.
Somewhere down the line something had to have purpose to start things in
motion or else nothing would have ever started in motion. And the same previous logical arguments apply
to this other something that started things.
All this
appears to be the only logical explanation to things starting. How could absolute nothing start something
without doing something? At whatever
starting point you choose to prefer something had to have purpose in
starting. What caused the first movement
in the physical multiverse or universe?
What caused the first thing to come to exist in the multiverse or
universe? Who or whatever caused this to
happen in the physical world had to have purpose; Even if the purpose was as
pointless as shooting heroin. All things
done have purpose whether they are done intentionally or unintentionally.
If it is
argued that the universe/multiverse is eternal then the universe/multiverse is
god; because something eternal had to have started everything. So as with every foundational concept of
beginnings we find an eternal something who is the cause. Once there is a cause we find that purpose
must follow.
Where do
we see anything in life that has action without there being purpose? If we notice something, anything at all it
has at least the purpose of being noticed.
There is not an argument that leads to purposelessness.
Does that
make sense?
I can
appreciate your desire to not be called religious because religion has had
negative connotations. But if we narrow
the religious definition too much we do not include everyone who believes in
something. We could choose to use
another word to define these believers.
Let us use the term Snuttlegle.
Every person who believes in something is a Snuttlegle person and once
again is not questioning whether a god, Supreme Being exists but which one
exists.
Your last
statement of the human brain creating religion and science I have to challenge.
How did the human brain create gravity, the laws of physics, math, geography
etc…? I think this may be where you have
missed things slightly. Man or human
brains did not create these things, they discovered these things that were
already created and used their brains to understand these things. If that is the case with science it is also
very likely the case with God/ Snuttlegles.
Man did not make love, hate, good and evil but discovered these things.
Does that
make sense?
Keep
thinking!! J
No comments:
Post a Comment